Central Office Staff
Dr. Matthew Harris, Superintendent firstname.lastname@example.org
Mr. Scott Inglese, Assistant Superintendent email@example.com
Beverly Formato, Administrative Specialist/Web Manager firstname.lastname@example.org
Colleen Kelly, Administrative Support Specialist email@example.com
Mr. Brett Lago, Business Manager/Board Secretary firstname.lastname@example.org
Joan Wehner, Assistant to Business Manager/Title IX Coordinator email@example.com
Megan Massarelli, Business Office Specialist firstname.lastname@example.org
Carol Smolka, Business Office Specialist email@example.com
Carrie Rausch, Business Office Support Specialist firstname.lastname@example.org
Danielle Smith, Human Resource Specialist email@example.com
Student Learning Supports
Mr. Greg Karazsia, Director of Student Learning Supports firstname.lastname@example.org
Anita Barber, Student Services Specialist email@example.com
Wendy Westwood, School Psychologist firstname.lastname@example.org
Jodi DiMiceli, School Psychologist email@example.com
Superintendent and Assistant Superintendent Evaluation
The PTSD superintendent and assistant superintendent are evaluated on the following 8 categories: Relationship with Board, Educational Leadership, Business and Finances, Staff/Personnel Relations, Student Responsibilities, Student Growth and Achievement, Community Relationship, and Personal Qualities. Based on the individual cumulative scores of each board member, the average rating is 3.9 out of 4.0
The PTSD superintendent and assistant superintendent are evaluated on the following 3 categories for Achievement of Goals: Goals for High Performance, Goals for Low Cost, and Overall Strategy for Student Achievement.
The goals for high performance include: PSSA results, Keystone Exam results, PVAAS (Student Growth) results, and the State Profile. Due to the performance of the students during the 2017-2018 school year, the board rated the superintendent and assistant superintendent a 34.72 out of 40.
The goals for Low Cost involved the superintendent and assistant superintendent maintain the school mission, which is effective, efficient, and quality education. Our district was the second lowest cost per pupil in the county and bottom five percent of the state. They were rated a 29.10 out of 30 points.
The Overall Strategy for Student Achievement included the following 5 categories: Graduation Rate, Attendance Rate, Career/SAP Goal, Reading Goal, and 21st Century Goal. Based on the results of the 017-2018 school year, the superintendent and assistant superintendent were rated 28.01 out of 30 possible points.
The overall performance of the superintendent and assistant superintendent was a Satisfactory Performance.